DAVID BETRAS: Why August’s ballot decision asking to create a 60% supermajority goes against majority rule
In the 220 years since Ohio became a state, the General Assembly has never scheduled a special election to consider a legislatively initiated constitutional amendment.
That streak is about to come to an end.
As I write this week’s column, the state’s 88 county election boards are preparing to do that.
A Civics lesson is needed
This extraordinary situation provides context for a Civics lesson that I hope will give the voters the information they need to make an informed decision when—and if they cast a ballot on August 8.
I say “if” because the turnout for August specials is meager.
For example, only eight percent of the electorate participated in last year’s primaries for seats in the state house and senate.
Turnout has been so abysmal that the same legislators who just scheduled the upcoming election voted to do away with them just a few months ago.
I’ll have more to say about that in a bit.
For now, back to the Civics lesson.
Our form of government is based on majority rule
Let’s start with the basics: our form of government.
While commonly referred to as democracies, the United States, Ohio, and the other 49 states are democratic republics in which the people vote for the representatives who govern.
The Founding Fathers embraced this model because they believed it was the most effective and efficient way to manage the nation’s affairs.
The principle of majority rule is the engine that drives democratic republics.
According to famed mathematician Kenneth May, majority rule is the only “fair” way to conduct elections because it does not allow some votes to count more than others, and unlike supermajority rules, it does not enable the status quo to prevail even though it received fewer votes.
Is the system perfect?
Of course not.
When our elected representatives abandon or ignore the will and wishes of their constituents due to corruption, gerrymandering, or the influence of big money, the public justifiably loses faith in government.
That is precisely the situation in Ohio at the beginning of the 20th Century.
Ohio can learn lessons from 1912
Outraged by a state government that was being sold to the highest bidders, a group of reformers and progressives convinced the voters to convene a Constitutional Convention in 1912.
During weeks of deliberations, delegates wrote, and voters later approved a proposal that served as the antidote to unresponsive government: Article 2, Section 1 of the Ohio Constitution which enables citizens to place an amendment directly before voters on a statewide ballot who must approve it by a simple majority vote.
The citizen-initiated amendment process is complicated and laborious as it should be.
Over the past 111 years, 71 proposals have been placed before the voters, and 19 have been approved.
Many have improved our quality of life, including imposing a 10-mill limit on unvoted property taxes, home rule authority for cities and counties, banning smoking in public places, and raising the state’s minimum wage and indexing it to inflation. By any measure, the process has benefited Ohioans.
How the August election is contradictory
This brings us back to the impending unprecedented August election.
For a reason I will not address here, the Republican majority in the General Assembly is placing an amendment that will fundamentally change the rules that govern the initiative process on the ballot in August.
Their proposal will raise the threshold for approving initiated amendments from the century-old 50% plus one standard to a 60% supermajority.
If passed, it will erase the principle at the very heart of our system of government and replace it with minority rule.
And, in a final bit of irony, they will only need to secure 50% plus one vote to do it at an August election, they hope most Ohioans won’t notice.
Constitutional scholar and former Ohio House member Mike Curtin believes trashing Ohio’s 220-year-old tradition of respecting voters is a historic and contemptuous act of bad faith.
Fortunately, the voters, thanks to 1912 Constitutional Convention will have the final say.
David J. Betras can be reached at 330-746-8484 or dbetras@bkmlaws.com.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(EDITOR’S NOTE: Get the latest Mahoning Valley news in your email inbox weekday mornings. Sign up here for our free daily newsletter.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here’s how you can support Mahoning Matters.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Mahoning Matters on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.